gcdedo
06-26 04:09 PM
Guys ..,check this out..
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14905516.htm
It might be time to ride on this boat..
Best Luck
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14905516.htm
It might be time to ride on this boat..
Best Luck
wallpaper 26 January 2010
kirupa
02-28 04:15 PM
Added!
.jpg "hair REPUBLIC DAY 26 JAN")
Macaca
12-11 08:31 PM
Congress Has Been Stymied By Bush, Republicans (http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-usa-congress.html) By REUTERS, December 11, 2007
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush wants it known the U.S. Congress has been asleep at the switch since Democrats took over in January. The only problem is that he and his fellow Republicans have flipped off the switch at nearly every turn, Democrats say.
"The end of 2007 is approaching fast and the new Congress has little to show for it," Bush told reporters in the White House Rose Garden last week.
Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader in the House of Representatives, was even less generous. "Nothing has been accomplished all year," he said.
As they excoriate political opponents, Bush and his fellow Republicans in Congress have successfully stopped most major Democratic initiatives this year.
They have staged an unprecedented number of "filibusters" in the Senate, where Democrats do not have a big enough majority to end debate. The few times that wasn't the case, Bush used his veto pen to kill Democrats' top priorities, like ending the Iraq war, expanding health care to children from low-income families and expanding stem cell research.
"Sadly, Republicans in Washington are determined to make this a 'no-can-do' Congress," Assistant Senate Majority Leader Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said in his party's weekly radio address on Saturday.
With only a week or two remaining in the first half of 110th Congress that convened in January, there's a deflated feeling on Capitol Hill.
Democrats and Republicans complain not enough has been accomplished. The public seems to agree, with just one in five Americans approving of the job Congress is doing, even worse than the unpopular Bush's ratings.
The legislative deadlock might get even worse next year, as election campaigns for Congress and the presidency get into full swing.
Ethan Siegal of the Washington Exchange, a private group that tracks Congress, said of Republicans' opposition tactics: "The template for trying to get into power is to make sure the party in charge doesn't have many legislative successes."
But even many Republicans think accusations of a "do-nothing" Democratic Congress won't be enough for their party to win back their majority status in the November 2008 elections.
PROMISES KEPT?
Democrats quickly fulfilled many of their 2006 campaign promises, raising the minimum wage for the first time in a decade, implementing stalled recommendations of the commission that investigated the September 11 attacks and trying to stop ethics abuses that plagued Congress during years of Republican leadership.
Republicans blocked many other measures.
A top domestic priority -- reforming U.S. immigration law -- was buried by conservative Republicans in the House. On foreign affairs, Republicans killed repeated moves to bring combat in Iraq to an end, despite Americans' disenchantment with a war now in its fifth year. Anti-war feeling was a driving factor behind the Democrats' success in last year's elections.
Popular legislation to expand stem cell research to help cure diseases such as Parkinson's was vetoed by Bush, as was a bill to deliver health care to more children from low-income families.
More recently, the House passed an energy bill that would improve automobile fuel efficiency for the first time in 32 years but Senate Republicans, heeding a White House veto threat, stopped it.
And Bush has veto threats on the remaining bills to fund the government through next September.
He recently told Arkansas business leaders: "You're fixing to see what they call a fiscal showdown in Washington."
But despite the bluster, Bush and congressional Democrats are at odds over a relatively tiny slice, about $11 billion, of the nearly $3 trillion budget.
Negotiations between the two finally have begun, but a compromise -- some war funding coupled with some of the additional domestic spending Democrats want -- was showing signs of souring this week, again amid accusations of Republican sabotage. There's plenty of incentive for a deal though as neither side wants government shutdowns to begin if agencies run out of money this month.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush wants it known the U.S. Congress has been asleep at the switch since Democrats took over in January. The only problem is that he and his fellow Republicans have flipped off the switch at nearly every turn, Democrats say.
"The end of 2007 is approaching fast and the new Congress has little to show for it," Bush told reporters in the White House Rose Garden last week.
Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader in the House of Representatives, was even less generous. "Nothing has been accomplished all year," he said.
As they excoriate political opponents, Bush and his fellow Republicans in Congress have successfully stopped most major Democratic initiatives this year.
They have staged an unprecedented number of "filibusters" in the Senate, where Democrats do not have a big enough majority to end debate. The few times that wasn't the case, Bush used his veto pen to kill Democrats' top priorities, like ending the Iraq war, expanding health care to children from low-income families and expanding stem cell research.
"Sadly, Republicans in Washington are determined to make this a 'no-can-do' Congress," Assistant Senate Majority Leader Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said in his party's weekly radio address on Saturday.
With only a week or two remaining in the first half of 110th Congress that convened in January, there's a deflated feeling on Capitol Hill.
Democrats and Republicans complain not enough has been accomplished. The public seems to agree, with just one in five Americans approving of the job Congress is doing, even worse than the unpopular Bush's ratings.
The legislative deadlock might get even worse next year, as election campaigns for Congress and the presidency get into full swing.
Ethan Siegal of the Washington Exchange, a private group that tracks Congress, said of Republicans' opposition tactics: "The template for trying to get into power is to make sure the party in charge doesn't have many legislative successes."
But even many Republicans think accusations of a "do-nothing" Democratic Congress won't be enough for their party to win back their majority status in the November 2008 elections.
PROMISES KEPT?
Democrats quickly fulfilled many of their 2006 campaign promises, raising the minimum wage for the first time in a decade, implementing stalled recommendations of the commission that investigated the September 11 attacks and trying to stop ethics abuses that plagued Congress during years of Republican leadership.
Republicans blocked many other measures.
A top domestic priority -- reforming U.S. immigration law -- was buried by conservative Republicans in the House. On foreign affairs, Republicans killed repeated moves to bring combat in Iraq to an end, despite Americans' disenchantment with a war now in its fifth year. Anti-war feeling was a driving factor behind the Democrats' success in last year's elections.
Popular legislation to expand stem cell research to help cure diseases such as Parkinson's was vetoed by Bush, as was a bill to deliver health care to more children from low-income families.
More recently, the House passed an energy bill that would improve automobile fuel efficiency for the first time in 32 years but Senate Republicans, heeding a White House veto threat, stopped it.
And Bush has veto threats on the remaining bills to fund the government through next September.
He recently told Arkansas business leaders: "You're fixing to see what they call a fiscal showdown in Washington."
But despite the bluster, Bush and congressional Democrats are at odds over a relatively tiny slice, about $11 billion, of the nearly $3 trillion budget.
Negotiations between the two finally have begun, but a compromise -- some war funding coupled with some of the additional domestic spending Democrats want -- was showing signs of souring this week, again amid accusations of Republican sabotage. There's plenty of incentive for a deal though as neither side wants government shutdowns to begin if agencies run out of money this month.
2011 By Admin On Wednesday,
kumar1
12-17 05:49 PM
There is a retrogression in perm process..only those who came to this country before 2000 can file for PERM.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
kidding man.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
kidding man.
more...
Blog Feeds
02-13 11:50 AM
Republicans who think Hispanic voters really are just the same as every other group and don't care about immigration are dead wrong. Most Americans don't think much about immigration and rank it way down on the list of pressing issues. And they're mixed on how they feel about it. But Hispanics - swing voters in numerous states - are fired up on this issue. When they turn out in big numbers (like in 2008), states that should be reliably red (Indiana, Virginia) go blue. The smart Republican GOP contenders (Jeb Bush, Newt Gingrich, Donald Trump) are making it clear that...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/02/immigration-returns-to-the-top-of-hispanics-list-of-most-pressing-issues-.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/02/immigration-returns-to-the-top-of-hispanics-list-of-most-pressing-issues-.html)
nish2006
01-28 01:21 PM
Hi,
My employers are considering transfering me to another group company (different name) during the next 1-2 months. My job profile will remain unchanged, but the employer name/address (on paychecks, etc) will be different after the transfer. My I-140 is still pending (filed in Aug 2007 together with I-485 at NSC under EB-3).
I'd greatly appreciate anyone's advice on the following:
a) If I transfer before my I-140 is approved, do I need to notify USCIS in writing? If so, does any specific paperwork need to be filled out? My employers have assured me they will continue to support my I-140/485 under the original company name, for as long as required.
b) If I transfer after approval of I-140 (fingers crossed!), do I need to notify USCIS? Again, is any specific paperwork necessary?
Many thanks in advance.
My employers are considering transfering me to another group company (different name) during the next 1-2 months. My job profile will remain unchanged, but the employer name/address (on paychecks, etc) will be different after the transfer. My I-140 is still pending (filed in Aug 2007 together with I-485 at NSC under EB-3).
I'd greatly appreciate anyone's advice on the following:
a) If I transfer before my I-140 is approved, do I need to notify USCIS in writing? If so, does any specific paperwork need to be filled out? My employers have assured me they will continue to support my I-140/485 under the original company name, for as long as required.
b) If I transfer after approval of I-140 (fingers crossed!), do I need to notify USCIS? Again, is any specific paperwork necessary?
Many thanks in advance.
more...
rkdnc9
09-18 12:35 PM
Friends,
Please suggest me what would be the best thing for me to do in my situation.
My H1 approval notice was sent to my employer (company A) on sep 10th. I got another job offer from company B in the meanwhile. I would like to start working for company B. I called company A and they said it would take this month end to get the papers. Is there anyway I can start working for company B from Oct 1st (unpaid or any other way) and then take papers(atleast a copy of approval notice) from company A and then apply for h1 transfer in the first week of october?
Please help.
Thanks in advance.
-rkdnc9
Please suggest me what would be the best thing for me to do in my situation.
My H1 approval notice was sent to my employer (company A) on sep 10th. I got another job offer from company B in the meanwhile. I would like to start working for company B. I called company A and they said it would take this month end to get the papers. Is there anyway I can start working for company B from Oct 1st (unpaid or any other way) and then take papers(atleast a copy of approval notice) from company A and then apply for h1 transfer in the first week of october?
Please help.
Thanks in advance.
-rkdnc9
2010 hair REPUBLIC DAY 26 JAN
puja101
07-14 12:15 AM
I received RFE letter from USCIS for missing TB skin test result in the medical reports.I took TB skin test in 2007 and came out negative.Here is the test of RFE
"your application contained form I-693 in which the required TB skin test was not conducted. Please note there may be conflicting information on some published form I-693 instructions regarding when the chest X ray Report should be performed. It is required only when the TB skin test indicates a reaction equal to greater than 5 mm, or when the reason for why the TB skin test is medically inappropriate to perform has been annotated on theform I-693. Please submit a newly completed form I-693 indicating the results of the required skin test."
After consulting the doctor concerned, she filled up new I-693 form with 2007 test results and provide me I-69e form in a sealed envelop. Can you please let me know whether 2007 TB skin test results will be acceptible to USCIS or do I need to do another TB skin test? Please Help.
"your application contained form I-693 in which the required TB skin test was not conducted. Please note there may be conflicting information on some published form I-693 instructions regarding when the chest X ray Report should be performed. It is required only when the TB skin test indicates a reaction equal to greater than 5 mm, or when the reason for why the TB skin test is medically inappropriate to perform has been annotated on theform I-693. Please submit a newly completed form I-693 indicating the results of the required skin test."
After consulting the doctor concerned, she filled up new I-693 form with 2007 test results and provide me I-69e form in a sealed envelop. Can you please let me know whether 2007 TB skin test results will be acceptible to USCIS or do I need to do another TB skin test? Please Help.
more...
srikondoji
12-07 07:31 PM
However, this was resolved and civil nuclear bill will go ahead for final approval in another 2 days.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1861966,001301790001.htm
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1861966,001301790001.htm
hair 26 January 2011. views: 289
iheartindia79
12-20 04:34 PM
Applying for SSN doesn't invalidates your H1..
I received my EAD recently and shortly applied and got SSN. Its a card which allows you to work. Doesnt cancel nothing :D
I received my EAD recently and shortly applied and got SSN. Its a card which allows you to work. Doesnt cancel nothing :D
more...
marajade208
10-07 08:43 AM
Hi, I am a new user or Swift. In fact, I just installed it.
Is there a way to increase your work space views or do I need a bigger monitor.
I'm sure that this is in a tutorial somewhere, but I am impatient and would like the answer if someone already knows. :crazy:
Thanks
:smirk:
Is there a way to increase your work space views or do I need a bigger monitor.
I'm sure that this is in a tutorial somewhere, but I am impatient and would like the answer if someone already knows. :crazy:
Thanks
:smirk:
hot 26 January 2011. views: 253
virtual55
11-22 01:57 PM
Hello Gurus,
Can we change company based upon approved I140 and get a 3 H1B in the 7th year of H1
what happens if my previous employer cancels I140.
Can we change company based upon approved I140 and get a 3 H1B in the 7th year of H1
what happens if my previous employer cancels I140.
more...
house 26 January 2010 | Posted by
Blog Feeds
08-02 07:10 AM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
USCIS has announced that beginning October 1, 2010, domestic offices and U.S. territories, including the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, will no longer be accepting cash payments. Other payment options will include money orders, credit cards, and checks (including personal checks).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/ZK9BnhuCOWE
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/ZK9BnhuCOWE/uscis_changes_payment_options.html)
USCIS has announced that beginning October 1, 2010, domestic offices and U.S. territories, including the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, will no longer be accepting cash payments. Other payment options will include money orders, credit cards, and checks (including personal checks).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/ZK9BnhuCOWE
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/ZK9BnhuCOWE/uscis_changes_payment_options.html)
tattoo Wednesday, January 26, 2011
immi_enthu
09-28 06:30 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13853&highlight=alien
the above thread has many more with same issue.
the above thread has many more with same issue.
more...
pictures boxer brief underwear January
Blog Feeds
05-18 11:10 AM
I think most Immigration Judges try to do their job in a fair way. But there are a few that really cross the line way too often. The press has covered this and I've tried to bring some of these problems to light in this forum. Now EOIR wants people who have been victimized by poor conduct from an Immigration Judge to complain and they've established a complaint portal on their web site.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/eoir-creates-process-to-complain-about-bad-immigration-judges.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/eoir-creates-process-to-complain-about-bad-immigration-judges.html)
dresses Releasing Date: January 26,
imneedy
10-17 11:35 AM
Does your EAD state that you can use it for returning to US?
more...
makeup 2008 January 26
aadimanav
10-11 07:01 PM
If the LC says salary $52,000. Is it safe to accept the job offer with more than $95,000?
Thanks!
Thanks!
girlfriend Tuesday, January 26, 2010 7:03
Blog Feeds
07-23 11:40 AM
Belgian-born Diane Von Furstenberg was profiled yesterday in the New York Times as an example of a fashion designer who is actually doing well despite the economic downturn. Furstenberg has been a major figure in American fashion design for nearly four decades. Her designs are worn by famous women like Jessica Alba, Madonna and Jennifer Lopez. Von Furstenberg gave some common sense advice in the interview that is worth repeating: �It�s more important than ever to have confidence. Everyone else is insecure. If you start to take a little bit of everyone else�s insecurity � forget it.�
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/immigrant-of-the-day-diane-von-furstenberg-fashion-designer.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/immigrant-of-the-day-diane-von-furstenberg-fashion-designer.html)
hairstyles Previous Wallpaper
santoshmn
06-17 12:47 PM
Hi all,
My PERM labour certification was filed on 25th oct 2006, my case was selected for random audit on dec 06. My attorney replied with all the evidence for the audit. After reviewing the case CO at dol denied my case on Feb 07.
My attorney has asked my case to be reconsidered/reopen on March 2007 as they are confident that they have supplied all the documents required for the case. My attorney says it will take 6-8 months for DOL reopen the case and judicate the same which is Nov 07. what is best option i have as all the dates are current now? i have discussed with my attorney they have told me clearly they are not going to reapply as its a very big company and it will take lot of time for me to get clearance to file my perm again.
Does anybody having experience like my case can share your views it will be really helpful.
Thanks,
Santosh.M.N
My PERM labour certification was filed on 25th oct 2006, my case was selected for random audit on dec 06. My attorney replied with all the evidence for the audit. After reviewing the case CO at dol denied my case on Feb 07.
My attorney has asked my case to be reconsidered/reopen on March 2007 as they are confident that they have supplied all the documents required for the case. My attorney says it will take 6-8 months for DOL reopen the case and judicate the same which is Nov 07. what is best option i have as all the dates are current now? i have discussed with my attorney they have told me clearly they are not going to reapply as its a very big company and it will take lot of time for me to get clearance to file my perm again.
Does anybody having experience like my case can share your views it will be really helpful.
Thanks,
Santosh.M.N
manand24
10-25 03:28 PM
The case status message for mine and my wife's EAD changed to Card production ordered. It did not change to Approval notice sent. I received the EAD cards within 1 week of the Card Production e-mail. However my lawyer received the Approval notices (wife and mine) first week of October.
lovish_21
07-27 03:02 PM
HI,
I have concurrent filed I140 and 485 in Aug 2007. My I 140 is still pending. Can some one let me know what could be the reason. Is there any one whose i140 is pending since last three years.I am worried because processing time is around 4-6 months.Any help in this regard will be appriciated.
Thanks
I have concurrent filed I140 and 485 in Aug 2007. My I 140 is still pending. Can some one let me know what could be the reason. Is there any one whose i140 is pending since last three years.I am worried because processing time is around 4-6 months.Any help in this regard will be appriciated.
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment